← all parity reports

Mechanical

Kerf vs Esko ArtiosCAD

The packaging industry's gold standard structural CAD — versus an open-core alternative that adds structural performance and chat-native design.

10/10in Kerf today
7/10in Esko ArtiosCAD (included)
0behind a paid tier
2026-05-24last reviewed
CapabilityKerfEsko ArtiosCAD
Packaging ECMA / FEFCO code libraryD13 yes packages/kerf-packaging/src/kerf_packaging/ecma_generators.py yes source ↗
Parametric 2D dieline authoringD13 yes packages/kerf-packaging/src/kerf_packaging/dieline.py yes source ↗
3D fold simulationD13 yes packages/kerf-packaging/src/kerf_packaging/fold.py yes source ↗
Blank nesting optimisationD13 yes packages/kerf-cad-core/src/kerf_cad_core/nesting/nfp.py yes source ↗
Structural performance (BCT / ECT)D13 yes packages/kerf-packaging/src/kerf_packaging/bct.py partial source ↗
LLM / chat-native editingD13 yes src/components/ChatPanel.jsx no source ↗
Die-making integration / CNC outputD7 yes packages/kerf-packaging/src/kerf_packaging/dieline.py yes source ↗
Print pre-press / graphics integrationD7 yes packages/kerf-cad-core/src/kerf_cad_core/packaging/pre_press.py yes source ↗
Material cost / yield estimationD14 yes packages/kerf-costing/src/ yes source ↗
Open scripting / automation APID1 yes packages/kerf-sdk/README.md partial source ↗
  • yes shipped
  • partial works with limits
  • present, but behind an add-on or meter
  • no not available

Corrections welcome. These rows are read off published documentation on the date shown and go stale as products ship. If a row is wrong, open an issue — the source file is public/compare/artioscad.md and every claim in it carries a link.